| |
If It’s
Too Bad to be True, It Could Be DISINFORMATION1
As you read these words, the Information Age explodes...inside
and around you...with the Misinformation Missiles and Propaganda
bombs of outright Information Warfare (NO, English
“pro-situ” zine).
“Information" is chaos; knowledge is the spontaneous
ordering of that chaos; freedom is the surfing of the wave
of that spontaneity (Hakim Bey, The Information War).
In today’s overload of information, elementary truths
are easily buried and biased editing easily slip under the
motto “all the news that’s fit to print.”
According to Paul Virilio, the media industry benefits “from
a curious depravity in the laws of democracy.” While
not entitled to provide false information, current legislation
allows the media to lie by omission, by ruling out news that
might damage its interests. The fourth estate (defined as
the media) is, according to Virilio, the only institution
that functions outside any effective democratic control, since
the public does not get to hear any independent criticism
of these media. This is simply because such criticism does
not stand a chance of being broadcast.3 Surely, as Noam Chomsky
argues, one can always access information. To which Hakim
Bey incisively contests “provided one has a private
income and a fanaticism bordering on insanity.”4
Chomsky has denounced disinformation as the “manufacture
of consent.” In an indoctrinated society, he argues,
it is crucial to “prevent understanding,” to “divert
attention” and to “conceal what it is happening
before our eyes,” so that the elite groups, meaning
the state and corporate powers, can act without public constraints
to achieve their goals in the name of “national interest.”5
In a democratic society, unlike a dictatorial regime where
control is exercised through violence, it is necessary to
control not only what people do but what they think.
Not submitted yet to the interests of corporate media, the
Internet has arguably been regarded as a truly democratic
instrument for the dissemination of alternative information.
However, free access to the Internet and the ubiquitous nature
of cyberspace have come to represent a threat as well. The
“information bombs” or “the weapons of mass
disruption”6 threaten to attack communication systems
bringing financial and military instability by making it impossible
to differentiate between information and disinformation. This
demonizing of information puts at risk the freedom of the
Internet with a new security paradigm as measures of control
are being considered.
The first World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS),
held by the United Nations in 2003, talked about the digital
divide, knowledge dissemination, social interaction, political
engagement, media, education, and health. Yet according to
alternative groups, it was used to mystify the continuing
use of information to protect and advance the interests of
global capital.
Artists, activists, grassroots media and hacker collectives
have emerged to bring awareness and transparency to the control
of information flows. They deploy an array of different tactics
(satire, documentary exposé, fictionalization of news,
simulation, disruption) and media (installation, poster, video,
radio or internet.art) to demand freedom of information, and
bring forward omitted information.
Capitalizing on the ubiquitous nature of cyberspace and its
disguising power, The Yes Men take on an act of radical travesty
by cloning scrupulously the marketing jargon of corporations.
In the Dow Chemical Identity Correction, BBC World Service,
2004, The Yes Men faithfully copied the pharmaceutical
company’s website, subtley changing its content. The
controversy arose by the fooled visitors entering the fake
website. The BBC broke the news and set off worldwide exposure,
damaging Dow’s stock market. Relying on similar cybertactics,
the Italian collective 0100101110101101.org (Eva and Franco
Mattes) stirred a great deal of confusion and controversy
when in September of 2003 news went out nationwide that Karlsplatz,
one of Vienna’s main squares, was soon to be renamed
“Nikeplatz.” The guerrilla campaign was announced
through a plagiarized version of Nike’s website (www.nikeground.
com) proving in a reverse of fortune that the more corporations
rely on media the greater their vulnerability. These artists
use tactical media to expose its mechanisms.
Terror as a psychological phenomenon has entered the Information
Age where everyone becomes a suspect. The ongoing project
of Julia Meltzer and David Thorne’s The Speculative
Archive draws on the production of documents, their collection,
circulation and reception, and their socio-political effects.
Not conceived as a physical site with historical static truths,
the project is one in an evolving process of transformation.
In There may come a time when these places will be no
longer and all we will have left are the pictures: a selection
of incidents of photographing or videotaping by persons of
interest at various sites of interest, referenced with images
from other sources, 2005, Thorne and Meltzer collect
images pertaining to cases of people that were detained for
videotaping particular sites or for other reasons were found
in the possession of such videotapes, immediately turning
them into “persons of interest” as potential perpetrators,
and these sites as targets of terrorists attacks. This work
examines and contests the assumptions and interpretations
implicated in the appropriation of these documents, and in
which they “become documents of a future, and how representations
of this possible future are turned back on the present to
foreclose the field of political thought and possibility.”7
In the format of the left documentary exposé, Marcelo
Exposito’s Radical Imagination (Carnivals of Resistance),
2004, presents an alternative view from those opposing
the turn of global capital, that is often omitted or falls
in the interstices of mass media. Paul Chan’s The
Question of Democracy is an extremely complicated one,
2005, poses a criticism on the careless slogan use of democracy
by which the US administration has built its campaign on the
war on terror. Chan’s gesture of bringing to light a
peculiar text, Saddam Hussein’s speech on the subject
of democracy dated 1977, cries out for its paradoxical oddity
and poses a more complex reflection on the current political
and ideological state of the concept of democracy. Martha
Rosler’s If It’s Too Bad to be True, It Could
Be DISINFORMATION, 1985 - the exhibition’s homonymous
title -serves as the framework for the exhibition. Still under
the backdrop of Cold War politics and a pre-Internet technological
era (in which information relied on TV, radio or newspapers,
had less volume, and was more localized), Rosler’s work
resonates with a renewed dualist rhetoric (of us and the enemy,
good and evil) and is a precursor of the tactics of deconstruction
of news widely deployed today, vividly showing the currency
and common practice of disinformation in today’s media.
In an attempt to bypass and subvert the mass media, a number
of indymedia collectives have sprung with a common belief
in what Charles Esche has called the “modest proposal,”
and claimed their right to exercise free expression.8 The
collective neuroTransmitter has rekindled the power of the
mini-FM. Using a portable radio broadcast unit last year during
New York’s Republican National Convention, neuroTransmitter
‘mini-cast’ in the streets of Times Square, where
the top media corporations have their headquarter offices.
They provided information on the media’s corporate partnerships
in an attempt to bring to the attention of passersby the legitimacy
of their biased news. In Frequency Allocations (in 3 parts),
2005, neuroTransmitter explores and exposes the Federal government’s
control and regulation of the airwaves and questions the recent
Federal licensing of Lower Power FM. A poster and handouts
show how to produce DIY radio within and outside the federally
established limitations and illustrate the possibilities of
tactical frequency jamming.
Jean Baudrillard in the early 90s conceived Stealthy Agency,
“an invisible, anonymous and clandestine agency”
that would seek to track down unreal events with which to
disinform the public. This was based on the principle that
there were no longer ideas that had anything to do with facts–a
"utopia" of the sixties and seventies– but
instead, an upheaval of events without real actors or interpreters.
Ultimately, the Agency aimed at countering this simulation
with a radical dissimulation, to lift the veil from this non-happening
of events, to respond to the strike of events and of history.
Like history, wrote Baudrillard, “it, too, subscribed
to absent events, looking for a way to furnish the most exact
non-information on the absence of events.”9
Mercedes Vicente ©2005
1. Title of Martha Rosler’s work shown at the exhibition
Disinformationcurated by Gino Rodriguez at The Alternative
Museum in New York in 1985 (and in this exhibition).
2. Hakim Bey, The Information War, published online
by CTHEORY texts.
3. Paul Virilio, “The Media Complex,” The
Art of the Motor, (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota
Press, 1995), p.1.
4. Bey, ibid.
5. Noam Chomsky, “Disinformation”, Disinformation
(New York: The Alternative Museum, 1985) pp. 11-18.
6. Paul Virilio, The Information Bomb (London: Verso,
2000).
7. David Thorne in an email exchange, August 24, 2005.
8. Charles Esche introduces the concept of “modest proposal”
as one that articulates around “what might be, rather
than what is.” Essentially speculative in the sense
that a modest proposal imagines how things could be other
than what they are and relying on creativity, it is also very
concrete and actual in order to deal with real existing conditions
and what might be necessary to change them. This concrete
necessity is what gives it the term “modest.”
They depart from existing conditions and are aspirational
and purposeful in nature.
9. Jean Baudrillard, “Rise Of The Void Towards The Periphery”
published online by CTHEORY texts, translation by Charles
Dudas, York University. Originally published in French as
part of Jean Baudrillard, L’Illusion de la fin:
ou La greve des evenements (Paris: Galilee, 1992).
apexart's exhibitions
and public programs are supported in part by The Peter Norton
Family Foundation, Altria Group, Inc., and with public funds
from the New York Department of Cultural Affairs, and the New
York State Council on the Arts through the Fund for Creative
Communities, administered by the Lower Manhattan Cultural Council.
This exhibition received support from the LEF Foundation. |